<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Confessions of a Fur Fucker &#187; Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.furcreamer.com/category/philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.furcreamer.com</link>
	<description>Philsophical Ruminations about Spraying Fur Coats with Spooge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What The Internet Owes You</title>
		<link>http://www.furcreamer.com/2009/12/what-the-internet-owes-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.furcreamer.com/2009/12/what-the-internet-owes-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FurCreamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furcreamer.com/?p=919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s nothing to jerk off to in this post, so feel free to ignore it. I mentioned when I posted on my very first anti-fur comment this blog is a little over a year and a half old.  In that time I&#8217;ve gotten maybe 3 or 4 &#8220;semi-regular&#8221; commenters (thanks to them, of course) and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><em>There&#8217;s nothing to jerk off to in this post, so feel free to ignore it</em>.</p>
<p>I mentioned when I posted on my very first anti-fur comment this blog is a little over a year and a half old.  In that time I&#8217;ve gotten maybe 3 or 4 &#8220;semi-regular&#8221; commenters (thanks to them, of course) and run about 85 visits a day, mostly from Google and the keyword &#8220;fur fetish&#8221;.  Do I consider this a failure?  Nope, not really, as I really had no impression of what I was going to do with this blog in the first place.</p>
<p>In about 3 weeks there&#8217;ll be no more Movie Monday.  Simply because I don&#8217;t have any videos left.  There are other Pavlo vids, but he moved up to bigger file sizes and even now I&#8217;m a little concerned about how many of the 5 meg videos I&#8217;ve left up.  If a bunch of people suddenly decide to download all the videos at once, I could break the bank on my monthly transfer allotment.</p>
<p>When that happens, I imagine my traffic will decline a bit, since a lot people come for the videos and photos, and could give a crap what I think. That&#8217;s why there&#8217;s that note at the top, so they don&#8217;t waste time reading this, heh.  Again, I&#8217;m totally okay with that, it&#8217;s how the Internet works.</p>
<p>The Internet is ravenous beast that eats content with very bad manners.  Namely it generally doesn&#8217;t bother to say thank you or contribute anything in return.  Yahoo is littered with dead groups from people who just don&#8217;t seem to understand this fact.  Anytime a &#8220;You Must Contribute Or Be Banned&#8221;, or &#8220;Send Me A Pic I&#8217;ve Never Seen Before To Be Accepted&#8221;, or &#8220;I Posted My Entire Collection, Why Aren&#8217;t You Praising Me&#8221; sort of groups pop up, it amuses me.  Those generally die on the vine, with the owner complaining that the Internet did not behave according to their expectations.</p>
<p>Tough shit.  It&#8217;s the nature of the beast.  If you expect kudos for your actions, you&#8217;re in the wrong place.   I don&#8217;t expect people to thank me for this site.  This site isn&#8217;t all that great, and it wouldn&#8217;t be much of anything if Pavlo hadn&#8217;t generously allowed me to post his videos in the first place.</p>
<p>If you want to do something on the net to support your fetish, whatever it may be, do it because you want to do it, not because you expect something in the return. The left nav column is littered with stories that very few people bother to read, but I enjoy writing them, and I post them here because there are a few people also enjoy reading them. That&#8217;s good enough for me.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t misunderstand, I&#8217;m not dissing pay sites.  That&#8217;s a lynx-dyed fox of a different dye pattern.  If you&#8217;re a pro and your stuff is good, then you can get paid for it. Though if your stuff sucks and the only reason people paid is that you were the only guy on the market, then watch out&#8230; competition can be a bitch. (Seriously&#8230; 2 guys and neither could work up a decent load&#8230;?)</p>
<p>So, despite the fact that I don&#8217;t have thousands of adoring admirers, I&#8217;m not quitting.  If someday I post some whiny diatribe about how no one values my contributions and a bunch of copycats get all the glory, then fucking shoot me.  I&#8217;d love to see some copycats.  The Internet could use more guys, and properly equipped girls, whipping out their cocks and filming some nasty cumshots on expensive fur coats then proudly showing it off to all.  I&#8217;ll be the first to link to you and tell everyone to go say &#8220;thanks.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.furcreamer.com/2009/12/what-the-internet-owes-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glorious Technicolor</title>
		<link>http://www.furcreamer.com/2008/06/glorious-technicolor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.furcreamer.com/2008/06/glorious-technicolor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FurCreamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30s furs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[80s furs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black and white]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[color]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huge furs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old vs new]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furcreamer.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve made no secret of my love of 30&#8242;s furs. For sheer metric tonnage, some 30&#8242;s furs are at least the equal of their 80&#8242;s descendants. 30&#8242;s furs also generally bear far more massive collars and cuffs, a fine attribute as they are some of my favorite bits. There&#8217;s also wider variety of style from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve made no secret of my love of 30&#8242;s furs.  For sheer metric tonnage, some 30&#8242;s furs are at least the equal of their 80&#8242;s descendants.  30&#8242;s furs also generally bear far more massive collars and cuffs, a fine attribute as they are some of my favorite bits.  There&#8217;s also wider variety of style from the 30&#8242;s.  Most of these coats were one-of-kind creations from studio designers of the day.<br />
[SinglePic not found]</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get the wrong, the mega-foxes of the 80&#8242;s are still some of the finest examples of spunk targets imaginable.  I&#8217;m only explaining the grandeur of 30&#8242;s furs because my experience on the old FurHub taught me that my opinion wasn&#8217;t commonly shared amongst others of my kind.<br />
[SinglePic not found]</p>
<p>On the 80&#8242;s there was general agreement, to be sure, but, after various conversations I discovered what appeared to be the rather superficial reason for finding my gigabytes of <em>Turner Classic Movie</em> captures to be comparatively less than desirable.</p>
<h3>Save Us, Ted Turner!</h3>
<p>People don&#8217;t like black and white.  Honestly, I still don&#8217;t get it, but that seemed to be the chief complaint against the &#8220;old&#8221; movies.  Were the foxes just as, if not <em>more</em> awesome?  Hell yes they were.  They were in black and white, though, and apparently that made them inferior.  The more &#8220;modern&#8221; captures, be they film or the ever popular <em>Dynasty </em>or <em>Paper Dolls</em>, were always most requested.<br />
[SinglePic not found]</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never really found it problematic to whack off to Greta Garbo over Morgan Fairchild.  The fact that one is in black and white the other is in color never really crosses my mind as I&#8217;m mulling over exactly how many gallons of sperm would be soaking their respective fox coats.  Yet many seem to unable to reconcile Greta&#8217;s monochrome hues.<br />
[SinglePic not found]</p>
<p>Feel free to comment about the glories of Technicolor over the drab grays of black and white.  My position is simple, if it&#8217;s a giant fox coat, I don&#8217;t care if it&#8217;s being shown in black and white or color.  For those who do, I&#8217;d love to know why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.furcreamer.com/2008/06/glorious-technicolor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stiff, or Hard Topics</title>
		<link>http://www.furcreamer.com/2008/04/stiff-or-hard-topics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.furcreamer.com/2008/04/stiff-or-hard-topics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FurCreamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transgender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furcreamer.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even among this rather extremely niche fetish, tastes may not always agree.  I&#8217;m going to get this out of the way. This blog will deal with, shall we say&#8230; hot babes in fur.  So far, so good, right? The &#8220;minor&#8221; caveat to that is that I really don&#8217;t mind if the hot babes have penis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even among this rather extremely niche fetish, tastes may not always agree.  I&#8217;m going to get this out of the way.  This blog will deal with, shall we say&#8230; hot babes in fur.  So far, so good, right?</p>
<p>The &#8220;minor&#8221; caveat to that is that I really don&#8217;t mind if the hot babes have penis or not.  Way I look at it, this fetish is already about cocks fucking and spunking on fur coats, so it&#8217;s a bonus if the cock happens to be attached to a girl&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Madeleine la Belle Flickr Page" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/madeleinelabelle/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-13" title="Madeleine la Belle - Schwarze Witwe" src="http://www.furcreamer.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/2378072630_1fc4e3bafc.jpg" alt="Madeleine la Belle - Schwarze Witwe" width="375" height="500" /></a></p>
<h3>Look for the Union Label</h3>
<p>That being said, when I deal with a &#8220;transgender&#8221; topic, I&#8217;ll label it as such, so if you&#8217;re not into that, you can skip it.  It&#8217;s the old, turn-the-channel trick, and I highly suggest you use it, instead of trying post something inflammatory in the comments.</p>
<p>I understand that t-girls, in their various forms, from CD to TS, aren&#8217;t everyone&#8217;s cup of liquid chinchilla, but that doesn&#8217;t mean you have to bitch about it.  This blog isn&#8217;t going to deal with them exclusively by any means.</p>
<p>There&#8217;ll be more than enough content to satisfy the purely he-man heterosexual readers.  He man heterosexual readers who get off with fur coats, but he-man heterosexual readers nonetheless.</p>
<p>So, to quote a sage old sea captain, &#8220;Fairly warned be thee, says I.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.furcreamer.com/2008/04/stiff-or-hard-topics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
